<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Sunday,  November 24 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Exposure not that widespread

By David C. Smith, Vancouver
Published: March 31, 2018, 6:00am

Dennis Franklin’s March 27 letter “Support our Blue Water Veterans” missed the reality of the Agent Orange “exposure” during our Vietnam military presence.

I think most Americans accept the fact that Army and Marine troops in Vietnam plus a smaller number of Navy sailors patrolling inland and coastal waterways were exposed to Agent Orange herbicide. Possibly many or most of them suffered medical problems later. To allow vets to make claims without medical proof the herbicide caused their problem, the Department of Veterans Affairs invented “presumptive exposure.” If a vet was in the exposed area it was presumed his medical problems were caused by that exposure.

I am a Blue Water Veteran. I was aboard and flew from a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier in 1968. It’s absurd to argue that sailors on a ship 30, 40, or 50 miles offshore were also harmed by chemicals sprayed on tropical foliage so far away. I hope the VA, Congress and vet service groups drop this illogical campaign before the nonveteran voters catch on.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...