<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Saturday,  November 30 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Check Out Our Newsletters envelope icon
Get the latest news that you care about most in your inbox every week by signing up for our newsletters.
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Returns prove salmon plan working

By Terry Flores, Portland
Published: March 21, 2016, 7:51pm

The March 15 editorial “Fishing for solutions” is way off base when it says attempts to mitigate the impact of dams “have often proven to be ineffective or even counterproductive.” That statement, based on a 2002 report, ignores 14 years of incredible progress.

It’s true that billions have been spent by Northwest families and businesses, through their electric bills to install new passage technologies at the dams. The result? An average 97 percent survival rate for young salmon at the eight federal dams on the Columbia and Snake rivers. Dam operations have changed dramatically, with water “spilled” to move salmon downstream more swiftly. And a 2008 agreement between federal agencies, states and tribes is providing $1 billion to restore habitat.

These measures and more compose an effective federal salmon plan based on sound science and supported by the Obama administration. Proof that the plan is working is seen in high salmon returns including record and near-record returns in 2014 and 2015. In fact, the plan is striking the very balance that The Columbian calls for: combining sound science with effective measures, while preserving carbon-free hydropower and commerce. For their massive investments in salmon recovery, the people of the Northwest deserve no less.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...