<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Sunday,  September 22 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Safety of bridge ignored

By Mike Hammerstrom, Vancouver
Published: November 5, 2015, 5:59am

After helping defeat the Columbia River Crossing, Rep. Liz Pike, R-Camas, went on to propose a seismic retrofit of the existing bridges. This makes me believe she and others opposed to replacing the bridges never read the CRC Independent Review Panel Final Report or any of several seismic studies. The report and studies say the bridges are very likely to collapse during an earthquake. A panel of nationally recognized bridge experts concluded that the bridges cannot be upgraded to fully meet seismic design standards without complete bridge reconstruction.

If the earthquake occurs during commute hours, the number of dead and injured on the bridges will be very high. While the collapsed bridges sit on the bottom of the river, all land and river commerce will cease. The cost of demolition and reconstruction will far exceed the cost of the CRC.

Some local politicians and wanna-be politicians exploited the voters’ fears of light rail and tolls and totally neglected safety concerns. The question that should have been put to voters is, “Do you want a bridge that won’t collapse?” It’s difficult for me to understand why Clark County Councilor David Madore proposes a third bridge while we continue to use “a disaster waiting to happen.” I question his motives.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...