<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  November 14 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Hanford is burden on both states

The Columbian
Published: December 8, 2012, 4:00pm

I just finished reading “Full Body Burden: Growing Up in the Nuclear Shadow of Rocky Flats,” by Kristen Iversen. It took me an awfully long time because the book is true and scary. It took the author 12 years to finish the book.

On the last page, the last sentence is: “To speak out or to remain silent is the first and most crucial decision we can make.”

On page 342 it says: “Hanford, which housed nine nuclear reactors, is one of the most heavily polluted places on Earth.” There are about 10 pages in the book with a sentence or two factually stating how bad the Hanford Site is in southeastern Washington state.

Hanford has to be handled right; stop damaging the Columbia River or ground water further. Do not let the Department of Energy lie, and do not allow them to bamboozle all of us.

Oregon is in this, too. We want it cleaned up. It affects us.

Barbara Pereira

Portland

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...