Property rights are correctly cherished in a free society, but even that bedrock principle cannot keep an eyesore from embarrassing people. In Clark County, one of the worst eyesores has languished for years, unfortunately at one of the most visible locations: the northeast corner of the intersection of Interstate 5 and 78th Street. Many of the countless people who have seen the grossly misnamed Value Motel must’ve thought: “Gee, what a great place for a fine restaurant or modern hotel or both.” Yet the dilapidated, 48-year-old Value Motel refuses to die and lingers as one of our community’s worst blemishes.
Marcus Griffith — more valiant than many of us — spent a night there recently and wrote about his $38 adventure for the Vancouver Voice. His story led county officials to take a closer look at the Value Motel. Perhaps there’s some way to clean it up, make it more presentable and less embarrassing. Maybe the owner can be coaxed to sell the property to someone who can build a more respectable establishment on the site between the freeway and Highway 99. Last Tuesday, Clark County commissioners endorsed Sheriff Garry Lucas’ suggestion to create a community task force that would search for solutions to the eyesore. This is an excellent idea, and participants likely will include representatives of the health department, code enforcement office, fire marshal’s office and law enforcement, plus a citizens’ representative.
But what about the property owner, you ask? Well, it would be great if Milt Brown would also agree to serve on the task force, and Lucas says the invitation will be extended. But Brown’s reluctance in the past to discuss solutions seems to be just as resolute as his refusal to sell the property. Brown isn’t talking to the press, and it’s uncertain if he’ll sit down with a task force.
And that is unfortunate. One would think that when the local sheriff, the health department, fire and law enforcement officers and your neighbors want to talk to you about your property, that would be a meeting worth attending. Apparently not so for the reclusive Mr. Brown.