Question by Columbian staff writer Kathie Durbin:
Describe briefly your vision for the nation’s energy future and the region’s. What new energy sources should the federal government promote/subsidize? Do you believe it’s possible for the U.S. to wean itself from fossil fuels? Regarding the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, what steps, if any, would you support to hold BP accountable, repair the environmental and economic damage in the region, and strengthen federal spill prevention rules?
David Castillo, Republican
We are blessed in the Pacific Northwest with an abundance of hydroelectric energy that provides us with lower energy rates than other part of the country. In addition, the presence of BPA provides us with some consistency for our energy grid. Although I support the use of wind, solar, biomass, and other “alternative” forms of energy, they are not currently capable of meeting the energy needs of our region.
I support continued investment in wind energy and would like to see a renewed interest and emphasis on biomass. In addition, I support the siting of new nuclear energy plants. Nuclear energy represents the cleanest, least costly, and most efficient energy source. Additionally, if we transform the American auto fleet from gasoline powered to electric powered, only nuclear energy will provide the increased energy needed for that transition.
I agree with former CIA Director James Woolsley that our goal should be to make oil the “salt of the 21st century”. Meaning, if we wean ourselves off of oil, oil becomes as important as table salt in our economy. However, I also realize that a shift from a fossil fuel based economy will not happen overnight. To that end, I believe it is in our national interest to explore for and utilize the natural resources (oil, natural gas, coal, etc.) that are available in this country.