Seventeen years. That’s how long it’s been since Fort Vancouver Regional Library District last went to voters with a request to increase its operating levy rate. It’s been that long because the district has been a careful, conservative steward of taxpayers’ money. As The Columbian stated in a recent editorial, the library district is “one of the best-run government entities in the community.”
Living within our means — The library district and its board of trustees have taken the approach that, in hard times like the current recession, the library takes its share of cuts along with other public agencies and struggling households. That’s why the library district was one of the first agencies to make substantial service reductions in 2009, eliminating ten percent of its staff positions, closing seven libraries an additional day each week, and making deeper cuts to an already lean budget.
The library district has taken numerous other steps to keep spending within revenue constraints while maintaining great library service in the three-plus counties we serve. We’ve purchased books, magazines, DVDs and CDs at a rate consistently below growing demand. We drastically curtailed books-by-mail service. We employ a collection agency to recover missing books and uncollected fees. We severely cut staff training expenditures. We’ve provided no raises, with the highest-paid staff taking pay reductions. We restricted the number of checkouts and holds allowed. We instituted patron self-checkouts for more effective use of available staff hours. And, with the help of the library foundation, we’ve used grants and partnerships to help fund critical programs such as Summer Reading and educating new parents about the importance of reading to their babies for healthy brain development.
The right time to let voters decide — The board’s philosophy of sharing the burden of economic hardship explains its decision not to pursue the option of a one-percent increase in 2010 property tax revenue that could have been secured without voter approval. Instead, the board accepted a 0.8 percent decrease in revenue and chose to defer to voters the question of whether to shore up library funding in a time of growing public need.